Which has higher meaning?
This has bothered me since this summer's sailing adventure.
Which has a higher meaning? A short generalization or a detailed explanation?
So which means more? Which is worth more? Rules of thumb or details?
It seems to me that both the very knowledgable and the very foolish frequently use generalizations.
Search
Categories
- Charleston (4)
- Church (2)
- fake (1)
- family (1)
- football (3)
- Gamecock football (2)
- Harding (1)
- left handed school (1)
- optical illusion (1)
- Photography (2)
- Playstation (1)
- politics (1)
- random (1)
- school (5)
- summer (1)
- webcam of the week (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(73)
-
▼
November
(22)
- Fort Lamar
- Little blue painted lines
- How to ruin a perfectly good day
- Random thoughts while running to Fort Lamar
- Extraordinary
- Cold
- The 2 dumbest things I've heard in a while
- Ultimate Frisbee
- Friday's Ramblings
- Playstation 3
- Optical Illusions... they're only fun if you see it
- Sunday bites
- I don't want to sound like an Alabama fan, but...
- Dirge of the left hand
- Webcam of the week #8
- Top 3 Blogs that I wish existed
- Believer's guide to finding a church home
- How would you spend $340,000,000,000?
- Football Championship
- Webcam of the week #7
- BCG's
- Which has higher meaning?
-
▼
November
(22)
1 comments:
I believe that if a person knows what they are talking about then a short generalization is better. Based on the individual’s knowledge they should be capable of giving me a brief detailed synopsis of the topic. However, if I ask for more detail they should be prepared for an ongoing discussion.
(that response ok, Amber) :)
Oh Josh, no need to censor your blog ;)
Post a Comment